0
BorderTeam

Further Resources

The Brutal Truth About Workplace Communication: Why Most Training Programs Are Complete Rubbish

Related Articles Worth Reading:

Here's something that'll make you spit out your flat white: after 18 years in corporate training and consultancy across Melbourne, Sydney, and Brisbane, I can tell you that 89% of workplace communication training is an absolute waste of everyone's time. And before you start typing angry emails, hear me out.

Last month I sat through another one of those polished presentation skills workshops where they teach you to maintain eye contact and use hand gestures. Bloody hell. If that's what passes for communication training these days, no wonder half our workforce can't have a decent conversation without checking their phones every thirty seconds.

The Real Problem Nobody Talks About

The issue isn't that people don't know how to speak clearly or write proper emails. The problem is we've turned workplace communication into this sterile, corporate theatre where everyone's terrified of saying what they actually mean. We've created environments where "circle back," "touch base," and "deep dive" have replaced normal human conversation.

I worked with a mining company in Perth last year where the CEO complained that his team couldn't communicate effectively. Turns out, they were all perfectly capable of clear communication - they just weren't allowed to disagree with anything without going through seventeen layers of diplomatic language first.

When someone says "I think we need to explore alternative approaches to this initiative," what they usually mean is "this idea is rubbish and won't work." But we've trained people to speak in riddles.

What Actually Works (And What Doesn't)

Active listening. God, I'm sick of hearing about active listening. Every communication course bangs on about it like it's some revolutionary concept. Here's the thing - most people already know how to listen. The problem is they're not allowed to respond honestly to what they hear.

Real communication improvement happens when you create psychological safety. Not the buzzword version where everyone pretends to be comfortable sharing their thoughts, but actual safety where people can disagree without career consequences.

I've seen this work brilliantly at companies like Atlassian and Canva, where they've managed to maintain that startup honesty even as they've grown. Their people actually say what they think because the culture rewards straight talking over political correctness.

The Australian Advantage We're Throwing Away

We used to be bloody good at this. Australian workplaces traditionally valued straight talking and getting to the point. But somewhere along the way, we imported all this American corporate speak and lost our edge.

The best communicators I work with are usually trades people who've moved into management. They learned to communicate on job sites where unclear instructions could literally kill someone. No room for ambiguity when you're working with heavy machinery or at height.

Compare that to the marketing manager who takes four paragraphs to ask for a simple report revision. Which communication style actually gets results?

Why Your Current Training Is Failing

Most communication training focuses on the wrong things entirely. They teach presentation techniques when the real issue is that people are afraid to present ideas that might be unpopular. They focus on email etiquette when the actual problem is that important conversations are happening over email instead of face-to-face.

I watched a pharmaceutical company spend $50,000 on communication training for their leadership team. Six months later, they still couldn't make decisions in meetings because everyone was too polite to challenge bad ideas. The training taught them how to communicate more professionally, but not how to communicate more effectively.

The fundamental flaw is treating communication as a skill you can learn from a manual rather than a cultural behaviour that needs to be modelled from the top.

What Good Communication Actually Looks Like

Effective workplace communication is messy. It involves interruptions, disagreements, and sometimes people getting a bit heated about things they care about. It's not always polite, and it's definitely not always politically correct.

The best teams I've worked with argue regularly. Not personal attacks or unprofessional behaviour, but proper debates about ideas, priorities, and approaches. They challenge each other because they know the work matters more than everyone's feelings.

I remember working with a tech startup in Sydney where the founders would have proper shouting matches in meetings. Sounds awful, right? But within five minutes they'd sort out the disagreement, make a decision, and move on. Their communication was raw but incredibly efficient.

The Training That Actually Makes a Difference

When I design communication programs now, I focus on three things that most trainers completely ignore:

First, creating permission to disagree. Most people know how to express their thoughts clearly - they just need explicit permission to do so without consequences.

Second, teaching managers how to handle conflict productively instead of avoiding it. Conflict isn't a communication breakdown; it's often a sign that people care enough about the work to fight for better outcomes.

Third, building systems that reward directness over diplomacy. If you promote people who give you comfortable lies over uncomfortable truths, you'll get exactly the communication culture you deserve.

The Million Dollar Question

Here's what nobody wants to admit: your communication problems probably aren't communication problems at all. They're culture problems, leadership problems, or structural problems disguised as communication issues.

When team members can't give honest feedback, when important decisions get made in sidebar conversations instead of meetings, when people are scared to raise obvious concerns - that's not a communication skills gap. That's a organisational dysfunction gap.

Fix the environment, and you'll find most people communicate just fine.

Moving Forward (Without More Workshops)

Stop sending people to generic communication courses. Start asking why they're not communicating effectively in the first place. Usually, the answer has nothing to do with their presentation skills and everything to do with what happens when they do communicate honestly.

The companies getting this right aren't the ones with the most polished communicators. They're the ones where people feel safe to be direct, where disagreement is seen as engagement rather than insubordination, and where the goal is clarity rather than comfort.

And if you're still convinced that your team needs another workshop on email etiquette or meeting facilitation, maybe the problem isn't their communication skills after all.

Further Reading: Check out more insights on effective workplace training approaches for practical solutions that actually work.